Security around the operating boundary.
Customer systems stay authoritative. Hosting, access, action permissions and evidence are defined for the deployment.
ExploreDefine what SupraOS may read, propose, change and verify. Scope, current evidence and named approval stay with the work as it crosses teams and systems.
Customer systems stay authoritative. Hosting, access, action permissions and evidence are defined for the deployment.
ExploreScope the sources and fields needed for the commercial outcome. Keep source references and permitted processing explicit.
ExploreReview the providers, processing boundary and permitted data use before deployment.
ExploreThe exact plan, current evidence and named approval determine what SupraOS may execute.
ExploreAgree the commercial objective, data access, owners and acceptance conditions before the first production run.
ExploreSecurity, legal and technical teams can request the materials relevant to the proposed operating boundary.
ExploreOnly the actions permitted by the agreed scope and current authority. Each integration states what it reads, may change and independently verifies.
No. The prediction informs the decision. Approval and scope determine authority. Independent observation establishes the result.
Customer private data is not used to train a shared model for other customers. The deployment-specific provider and processing schedule is reviewed before processing.
The proposed architecture, data flows, access scope, security schedule, DPA, provider schedule and deployment-specific operating commitments.
Review access, approvals, deployment and the evidence required to close the result.